God's Holiness and Man's Sinfulness
Psalms 51:1-4
God's mercies are new every morning
#Godsholiness
#confess
Published December 11th, 2020; Updated December 15th, 2020
Author
Share / Groups / About Author
Main point summary
Notes
Arc
notes
Main point summary
Forgive me, O God, because of your great love and mercy and for I am well aware of my sin. Only against you Lord have I sinned therefore, your words are fair and judgment without fault.
Notes
The Psalmist asks for mercy, because of God's steadfast love. He also knows of God's abundant mercy and therefore, He seeks forgiveness from God. The Psalmist continues to plead for cleansing from his sin, that is, that the Lord may wash him clean from his transgressions. He asks this because he is well aware of his sins. He knows his sinful nature and he does not deny it. Our sin is always against God and not man. When we sin is like we prefer something else other than God. We should be satisfied in God and find joy in Him alone. Sinning is seeking satisfaction in something other than God. Therefore, only against God do we sin for He requires we be satisfied in Him. And because of this, God's judgment against us is justified. God's steadfast love and abundant mercy should give us the confidence to go to Him for forgiveness. We know that we are sinful by nature and therefore, we sin. We should never deny it when we go before God in repentance for He knows our frame (Psalm 103:14). There is no way we can repent while denying our flaws. We should always go to God in repentance because only against Him do we sin. This is a Psalm of a sinful man asking for forgiveness from a holy God. He acknowledges that he has sinned towards God and therefore God is justified in His judgment. When we sin, may we seek God's forgiveness with the same earnestness as the Psalmist. We can always go to God for forgiveness for His mercies are new every morning. Lamentations 3:22-23
Arc
editing
OT
Psalms 51:1-4
esv
mine
w Have mercy on me, 1 O God,
O God, show me your compassion and forgiveness,
according to your steadfast love;
for your love is great and unchanging
ground
according to your x abundant mercy
and because of your overflowing mercy,
y blot out my transgressions.
therefore, take away from me my wickedness.
inference
series
z Wash me thoroughly from my iniquity,
Scrub away my wickedness from me
and a cleanse me from my sin!
and wash me clean from my sin!
ideaexplanation
b For I know my transgressions,
Because I am well aware of my wickedness,
and my sin is ever before me.
and I never loose the reality of my sinfulness.
c Against you, you only, have I sinned
You, O Lord, are the only one that I have done this wicked act against
and done what is evil d in your sight,
and only against you have I done what is evil according to your standard,
e so that you may be justified in your words
and because of my actions your words against me are right and fair
and blameless in your judgment.
and your judgment toward me is without fault.
actionresult
Forgive me, O God, because of your unchanging love and your overflowing mercy.
Cleanse me from my wickedness and sin for I am well aware of them.
Only against you Lord have I sinned so that your words are fair and judgment without fault.
The Psalmist cries for forgiveness from God for his sins because of God's love and mercy.
The nature of sin. Our sin is always against God.
discourse
Comments
Brent Karding
This is a Psalm of a sinful man asking for forgiveness from a holy God. He acknowledges that he has sinned towards God and therefore God is justified in His judgment. When we sin, may we seek God's fo...
This paragraph is a good summary of the application of the text! I suggest making it the last paragraph; your current final paragraph seems like an afterthought, and it doesn't flow with the previous paragraph at all.

Do you know what I mean? Your last paragraph is good, but it doesn't have a specific purpose where it is.

Actually, that's the biggest improvement you could make in the whole assignment: Each paragraph says something good, but the paragraphs aren't connected. They're like individual pearls, but there's no string holding them together. Does that image help? There should be statements saying things like, "Let's look at verses 1-3 first"; "notice how verse 4 explains verses 1-3"; and so on.
Isaac Dimba
Yes, I see what you mean.

Understood.
Brent Karding
Our sin is always against God and not man. When we sin is like we prefer something else other than God. We should be satisfied in God and find joy in Him alone. Sinning is seeking satisfaction in some...
What was the point of this section in relation to the first two paragraphs? It felt like a sudden jolt into a new topic.

The first two paragraphs are talking about the Grounds in 1 and 2-3 - that's good. I'd use a sentence to wrap this topic up and apply it before you move into verse 4: We should ask God for mercy because he has steadfast love, and because we know about our sins. (I'd also say that those two Grounds would make a good contrast: We know our sins, and so we should ask for cleansing - but why? Because our God is full of steadfast love, as shown on the cross!)

Then you should use a transitional sentence to let your readers know you are talking about verse 4 in the third paragraph.
Isaac Dimba
I was trying to explain verse 4. But yes, I should transition well.
Brent Karding
Against you, you only, have I sinned
I like having 1 and 2-3 related to each other as a Series, but I don't think 4 is a third part of that Series. Look at the focuses: 1 and 2-3 are both cries for forgiveness, while 4 is a statement about the nature of sin. So 4 could be an Explanation of 1-3.
Isaac Dimba
Yeah, that makes sense.
Brent Karding
according to your abundant mercy
Since 1c-d are one thought, following a semicolon, it would be better to have them joined together, as well as 1a-b, and then have both pieces joined.

So 1a-b would be Ground, and 1c-d Inference.
Isaac Dimba
Ohh, I see
Brent Karding
Where you have Progression in 2, 4a-b, and 4c-d, I would suggest Series instead: there isn't a progression moving forward in importance, but two equal elements.

And actually, your Series in 3a-b (and the ones I suggested above) would be improved by being made Id-Exp instead. I'm not sure if this was talked about in the Arcing course, but when two ideas are closely related like this, really saying the same thing in different words, Id-Exp is better. Series works better when the ideas are different.

Does that help?
Isaac Dimba
These really helps. Thank you so much.
Disclaimer: The opinions and conclusions expressed on this page are those of the author and may or may not accord with the positions of Biblearc or Bethlehem College & Seminary.